Brian McManus, a member of the 2009-2010 NMRT Online Discussion Forum, will lead this month’s Online Discussion: Open Access, Web 3.0–How Will Technology Continue to Change the Services of Libraries of the Near and Long Term Future? The discussion runs November 15 through December 14.
See Join the NMRT-L Discussion E-List for instructions on how to join in on this discussion.
For more information about the discussion forum, see 2009-2010 Online Discussion Forum.
Below is a select list of the pros and cons for each specific aspect of the topic and looking at the future:
Open Access
Pros:
1) It “gives scholars and libraries an increased role in the scholarly communication system” (Haschak, 2007).
2) Open Access helps mitigate the financial effects from the “predatory practices of some large commercial publishers” (Haschak, 2007).
3) Publishing with open access, peer reviewed journals makes scholarly communication available to a much larger audience, especially when published in an online journal.
4) As it is sometimes called Grey Literature, it “offers a much more comprehensive picture of the state of knowledge for any topic” (De Castro et al., 2008, P.144).
Cons:
1) Open access will undo the peer review process (Lewis, 2008, P.271).
Future:
One possible, reasonable future is that libraries will continue to pursue open access opportunities in order to mitigate constantly increasing journal subscriptions. Journal subscriptions will consistently decrease with the addition of each open access opportunity a library participates in.
Web 3.0: the next evolution for the Web, the intelligent Web, or a 3rd decade of the Web’s evolution resulting in a greater maturity . . .
Pros:
1) The use of natural language for searching and indexing
2) Semantic web applications can be used for enterprise date integration and other related functions.
3) Web 3.0 technologies have so far been using Web 2.0 technology
Cons:
1) I am not sure there is truly a downside to this next step for the Web, however I am not an expert.
Future:
The trends now being set in motion by Web 2.0, the personalization of the web, self service, and the added mobility of information, is creating a transforming environment where users are interacting with each other more and directly with information (Holmberg et al., 2009, P.669). This trend will continue and could possibly be creating the foundation of what is to come, Web 3.0.
References Consulted
Haschak, P.G. (2007). “The ‘platinum route’ to open access: a case study of E-JASL: The Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship” Information Research, 12(4) paper 321. [Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/paper321.html]
De Castro, P., Salinetti, S., & Banks, M. (2008). Awareness and empowerment in document production and distribution as a “must” for open access: Experiences from the “Nancy style” to guarantee quality. Grey Journal (TGJ), 4(3), 143-149. Retrieved from Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts database.
Lewis, D. (2008). Library budgets, open access, and the future scholarly communication. College & Research Libraries News, 69(5), 271-273. Retrieved from Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts database.
Holmberg, K., Huvila, I., Kronqvist-Berg, M., & Widén-Wulff, G. (2009). What is Library 2.0?. Journal of Documentation, 65(4), 668-681. Retrieved from Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts database.